Why I’m Writing

I'm writing from experience, not theory. I served at Diego Garcia from 1999 to 2000. Within a few years of leaving the island, I was diagnosed with Crohn's disease. It took two more decades to learn what may have caused it. By then the damage was done, and I had lived much of that time without the medical care that could have slowed the disease. Without water records, it is extremely hard for any veteran who served there to connect an illness to service. If it took me decades to understand, thousands of others who served there may still be suffering without knowing the cause. That is why I'm asking for action for all of us. I also contacted Dr. Rebecca Fry, Chair of Environmental Sciences and Engineering at UNC Chapel Hill and Director of the UNC Superfund Research Program. She responded by sharing published research relevant to this exposure, while noting how difficult it is to establish causation between exposure and disease. That difficulty is exactly why missing water records hurt veterans: without data, no one can make the connection.

Why Limited Energy

Professionally, limited energy is the low-voltage systems field I have worked in for my whole career, and where I earned my RCDD. Personally, living with service-connected disabilities means I work with limited energy, too. So I build systems that help me do more with less. This site is where those two sides meet.

A. Executive Summary and the Ask

Naval Support Facility (NSF) Diego Garcia is a remote atoll in the Indian Ocean. Every gallon of drinking water there came from a shallow freshwater lens under the island. The government’s own records show that this water was put at risk for decades:

  • 1991 jet-fuel leak. A ruptured underground JP-5 pipeline contaminated groundwater near one of the island’s major freshwater sources. Nobody knows how much fuel leaked. More than 134,000 gallons were recovered, and “substantial” fuel stayed in the aquifer [1][3].
  • Very high PFAS levels. In 2017, out-of-service Air Operations wells averaged 8,066 parts per trillion (ppt) of combined PFOS/PFOA, and one reached 86,630 ppt. EPA’s 2016 health advisory was 70 ppt [6]. Three Diego Garcia systems were among only 24 DoD water systems worldwide found above that advisory [5].
  • Unsafe tap water until 2018. In 2017, every tap was posted “Not suitable for drinking.” The Navy did not declare the tap water fit for drinking and cooking until February 28, 2018 [6][7]. The system still runs under a conditional permit, and its treatment still does not meet EPA’s surface-water filtration rule [9].
  • Missing records. Diego Garcia water-quality reports are posted publicly for 2020 to 2025, and one report covers 2017. We could not find any public finished-water test results for the 1970s through about 2016 [6][9][10]. PFAS testing of overseas Navy water did not start until a 2015 policy [6].

Bottom line: Diego Garcia is not a covered location under the PACT Act [13][14]. VA has no PFAS presumption of any kind [20]. Without a presumption, a veteran has to prove exposure with records that were never created, never published, or not kept. No records means no nexus, and veterans pay the price. This affects every veteran who served at an overseas installation with a poorly documented water system, not just one person.

The Ask

  1. Recognize the exposure (Congress). Add NSF Diego Garcia, and other overseas installations with documented drinking-water contamination, to the PACT Act’s covered locations, or enact a Camp-Lejeune-style water presumption.
  2. Designate a TERA now (VA). VA can use its existing authority to designate this service a Toxic Exposure Risk Activity, triggering nexus exams.
  3. Pass and fix pending bills. Cosponsor H.R. 3639 (VET PFAS Act) and clarify that it covers overseas installations; support S. 2220 (FORGOTTEN Veterans Act).
  4. Open the records and test going forward (DoD, via the NDAA). Require release of historical overseas drinking-water records and routine, published, PFAS-inclusive testing for every overseas system.
  5. Concede exposure when records are missing, so gaps in government records never defeat a veteran’s claim.
  6. State role. Ask the Texas Attorney General and state officials to press DoD and VA by formal letter and to support multistate action on service-member PFAS exposure.
  7. Fund the science. Broaden VA’s PFAS review beyond kidney cancer to include inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease).

Specific asks with their supporting evidence are in Section D.

B. Fact Sheet: Diego Garcia Water Timeline

Every entry below comes from a U.S. government source (USGS, DoD, U.S. Navy). Diego Garcia had about 3,500 residents and used roughly 0.8 to 1.2 million gallons a day, all of it pumped from the ground [1].

Early 1970s
The termiticide dieldrin was used on the island. In 2017 the Navy reported granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment as a precaution and no detections [6].
Early 1980s
The South Ramp was built with an underground fuel pipeline and many subsurface hydrants [1].
1985
USGS began keeping records of well withdrawals and chloride (salinity). These records cover water quantity and salinity, not finished-water safety testing [3].
May 1991
A rupture in an underground JP-5 jet-fuel pipeline at the South Ramp was discovered. It contaminated soil and groundwater near one of the island’s major freshwater sources, and the amount leaked is unknown [1]. The leak was about 800 ft from production wells. Ten Air Operations (Air Ops) wells were shut from May 1991 to April 1992, about 15% of the island’s capacity [3].
Apr 1992
A fuel-diversion program began, using six wells to recirculate about 150,000 gallons a day [3].
Feb 1993 to May 1994
Benzene levels rose steadily in groundwater and soil-vapor samples. More than 134,000 gallons of fuel were eventually recovered, and substantial fuel remained in the aquifer [1].
Aug 1997
More fuel contamination was confirmed. By the end of August, 10 of the 18 Air Ops wells were shut. Air Ops output fell from about 240,000 gallons a day before 1991 to about 60,000 by Sep 1997 [3].
1997 to 2016
Treatment consisted of “just an aeration, sedimentation, and chlorination,” in the Navy’s own words [8]. We found no public finished-water test results for these years.
Feb 2013 / Apr 2014
CNIC Instruction 5090.1 applied most U.S. national drinking-water regulations to overseas Navy systems (2013). An Installation Water Quality Board was created (2014) [6].
Sep 14, 2015
Navy policy first required PFAS (PFC) sampling of overseas drinking-water systems [6].
Jun 2016 to Aug 2017
DoD tested all 524 DoD-owned water systems worldwide and found 24 above the 70 ppt advisory. The Navy had six, including Diego Garcia’s I Site, Cantonment and Sub Site systems [5].
Jul 2016
PFOS/PFOA was found in Air Ops raw water [6]. DoD reported results of 5,849 (Cantonment/Air Ops), 102 (I Site) and 74 to 78 (Sub Site), with an alternate supply “already being provided due to other contaminants” [4].
Dec 2016
A new water treatment plant was commissioned [8][9].
Feb 2017
High lead and copper were found in the main distribution system, and the Deep Draft Wharf service lines were secured because of lead [6].
2017
All taps were posted “Not suitable for drinking due to high Total Trihalomethanes.” Drinking water was trucked in and bottled. Out-of-service Air Ops wells averaged 8,066 ppt PFOS/PFOA (range 96 to 86,630). Standby wells averaged 73.6 ppt and in-service wells 31.4 ppt [6].
May 2017 / Feb 2018
A sanitary survey found significant deficiencies, and only a Conditional Certificate to Operate was issued [6].
Feb 28, 2018
The main system was declared “fit for human consumption,” meaning tap water could now be used for drinking and cooking [7].
Dec 2023 / May 2024
The treatment plant became the sole supply (2023). Another 3-year Conditional Certificate to Operate was issued after the 2023 survey (2024) [9].
2025
PFAS were not detected at the Cantonment and Air Ops points of entry. The plant still does not meet EPA Surface Water Treatment Rule filtration requirements, so a public notice goes out every quarter. A filtration upgrade is programmed for FY2029 (MILCON P-116) [9].
Sep 2025 policy
A DoD policy requires initial PFAS monitoring at overseas installations by Apr 26, 2027 and compliance by Apr 26, 2029 [9].

Units note: DoD’s 2017 AFFF report gives the 5,849, 102 and 74–78 values without a unit label. Its footnote compares them to the 70 parts-per-trillion advisory, so ppt is implied [4]. The 2017 Navy water report states its values in ppt [6]. What the records do not tell us is how much contaminated water service members actually drank in any given year. That uncertainty is the problem this packet asks Congress and VA to fix.

C. The Systemic Gap: No Records Means No Nexus

To get disability compensation, a veteran must connect an illness to service. Where Congress or VA has set a presumption (Agent Orange, the PACT Act burn-pit locations, Camp Lejeune), that connection is assumed based on where and when the veteran served. Everywhere else, the veteran has to document the exposure. At overseas installations like Diego Garcia, the system blocks that at every step:

Not a covered location

The PACT Act lists covered countries from Aug 2, 1990 (e.g., Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, UAE) and from Sep 11, 2001 (e.g., Afghanistan, Djibouti, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Uzbekistan, Yemen). Diego Garcia is not among them [13][14][15].

No PFAS presumption

VA says: “Currently, there are no presumptions related to PFAS exposure in the military.” Claims are decided case by case, and VA does not offer PFAS blood testing [20]. In December 2025, VA limited its PFAS scientific assessment to kidney cancer and stated it “does not plan to create a PFAS registry” [21].

TERA depends on records

A veteran who took part in a Toxic Exposure Risk Activity gets a nexus exam and VA health care. Under 38 U.S.C. 1710(e)(4)(C), a TERA is an activity that requires an entry in an exposure tracking system, or one the VA Secretary designates [16]. VA guidance says name-only or routine ILER entries do not establish a TERA, and self-reported exposures must be validated [19].

ILER cannot show what was never measured

DoD’s Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record (ILER) labels self-reported exposures as self-reported and does not validate them. ILER does not determine eligibility. Veteran access is forecast for Fall 2026 [22]. If water was never tested, or the results were not kept, ILER has nothing to show.

Records were never required to last

Current DoD overseas drinking-water rules require keeping bacteriological records 5 years and chemical records 10 years (other monitoring records at least 3 years) [11]. Our inference: even if 1999–2000 records were made under similar rules, they could lawfully have been destroyed long ago. We could not find any public Diego Garcia water report before the one covering 2017 [10].

Oversight gaps were already known

GAO reported in 2017 (GAO-18-78) that DoD needed to improve internal reporting of drinking-water regulatory compliance [12].

The Camp Lejeune precedent. For contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, VA does not ask veterans to prove how much water they drank. Service of at least 30 days between Aug 1, 1953 and Dec 31, 1987 is enough, and eight diseases are presumed service-connected [23]. Congress and VA have already accepted that when the government contaminated the water and did not document individual exposure, location and dates are enough. Veterans who served at Diego Garcia and similar overseas bases deserve the same logic.

Who is affected. This is not one person’s problem. Every service member, DoD civilian and contractor who lived or worked at NSF Diego Garcia drank from the same system. The same problem likely exists at other overseas installations where water records are thin or never made public. DoD’s own worldwide testing found 24 systems above the 70 ppt advisory in 2016–2017, and 26 as of Oct 30, 2019 [5].

D. Specific Policy Asks, Tied to the Evidence

1. Presumptive exposure location (Congress)

Add NSF Diego Garcia (Cantonment, Air Ops, I Site and Sub Site systems) to the PACT Act’s presumptive-exposure locations, or enact a Camp-Lejeune-style water presumption. The period should run at least through Feb 28, 2018, when tap water was first declared fit for drinking. The start date should be set from the evidence: dieldrin use in the early 1970s, fuel infrastructure in the early 1980s, the fuel leak discovered in 1991 [1][6][7]. Direct DoD to identify other overseas installations with similar documented exceedances so they can be added.

Evidence: Sections B, C; [1][5][6][7][23]

2. TERA designation now (VA Secretary)

The Secretary can already decide that an activity counts as a TERA, “taking into account what is reasonably prudent to protect the health of veterans” [16]. Designate service at NSF Diego Garcia, and at other overseas installations with documented drinking-water exceedances, as a TERA. That triggers nexus exams under 38 U.S.C. 1168, which must consider total and combined exposures [17], and it requires no new law.

Evidence: [4][5][6][16][17]

3. Formal presumption review (VA)

Use the 38 U.S.C. 1172–1173 process to formally evaluate overseas garrison drinking-water exposures: PFAS, fuel hydrocarbons including benzene, disinfection byproducts (TTHM) and lead [18].

Evidence: [1][6][18]

4. Open the historical record (DoD, via NDAA or report language)

Require DoD to publish every available drinking-water record for NSF Diego Garcia and all overseas installations from 1970 to the present. That includes monitoring results, sanitary surveys, Certificates to Operate, consumer confidence reports, fuel-spill and remediation files, and USGS data. DoD should also publish an inventory of the records that are missing or destroyed.

Evidence: [3][10][11][12]

5. Routine, public, PFAS-inclusive reporting going forward

Require an annual public water report, posted online, for every overseas DoD water system, including PFAS results using EPA analytical methods. Chemical monitoring data should be kept permanently and loaded into ILER by location and date. Today’s 3-, 5- and 10-year retention rules [11] guarantee that this records gap will happen again.

Evidence: [9][10][11][22]

6. Missing records shall not defeat a claim (Congress)

In law, provide that when DoD cannot produce drinking-water monitoring records for an installation and period, VA must concede exposure for any veteran whose service there is documented. The burden of missing government records should fall on the government.

Evidence: Section C; [19][22]

7. Fund the science

Fund VA/DoD studies of overseas-garrison cohorts using the DoD Serum Repository. A small 2024 pilot study used that repository and found pre-diagnosis PFAS levels associated with both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis [30]. NIH funded a larger follow-up in October 2026 [38]. Expand VA’s PFAS assessment beyond kidney cancer to the conditions the C8 Science Panel linked to PFOA (ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, high cholesterol, testicular cancer and pregnancy-induced hypertension) and to inflammatory bowel disease as a whole, including Crohn’s disease [21][27][30]. Reconsider VA’s decision not to create a PFAS registry, and offer PFAS blood testing consistent with National Academies guidance [20][21][34].

Evidence: [21][27][30][34]

8. Make ILER complete

Require ILER to include historical installation water-system data (contaminant, concentration, dates, population served) so exposure is recorded by location, not only by individual report. Support S. 2220 (FORGOTTEN Veterans Act), which would expand ILER to document toxic exposures [26].

Evidence: [22][26]

9. Fix and pass pending bills

H.R. 3639, VET PFAS Act (Rep. Lawler, R-NY; referred to HVAC Health Subcommittee June 6, 2025) would provide care and presumptions for veterans at a “covered military installation” with PFAS exposure [24]. Ask: cosponsor it, and amend it to state expressly that overseas installations are covered and that missing monitoring records do not exclude an installation. H.R. 4192, Military PFAS Transparency Act (Rep. McDonald Rivet, D-MI) requires PFAS remediation reporting [25]. Ask: extend it to overseas drinking-water systems.

Evidence: [24][25]

10. State role (Texas Attorney General and state officials)

Press DoD and VA by formal letter to release historical overseas drinking-water records and to concede exposure when records are missing; join or support multistate efforts urging federal action on PFAS exposure among service members and veterans, including routine published PFAS testing at overseas installations; publicly support affected Texas veterans.

Evidence: Sections B, C

Note on H.R. 3639 cosponsors: As of Oct 7, 2026, congress.gov lists Reps. Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Kean (R-NJ) among the Republican cosponsors along with sponsor Rep. Lawler. Rep. Pfluger is not listed [24].

E. Research Summary, with Honest Caveats

Veterans are best served by an accurate account of the science, including where it is uncertain. That uncertainty is the reason presumptions exist: they settle questions that individual veterans cannot answer from incomplete records.

PFAS (PFOS/PFOA, from firefighting foam)

  • C8 Science Panel (2012), which studied a highly exposed U.S. community, found a “probable link” between PFOA and ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, high cholesterol, kidney cancer, testicular cancer and pregnancy-induced hypertension. It found no probable link for Crohn’s disease and many other conditions [27]. The PFOA conditions in H.R. 3639 track this list [24]. In 2022 the National Academies rated the evidence for PFAS and ulcerative colitis in adults as “limited or suggestive” [34][36].
  • Steenland et al. (2018): ulcerative colitis patients had about 38% higher blood PFOA than controls. Caveat: blood was drawn after diagnosis [28].
  • Fart et al. (2021): PFAS levels were higher in late-onset ulcerative colitis, and PFOA caused intestinal barrier defects in mouse intestinal tissue [29].
  • Agrawal et al. (2024), military serum: used stored DoD Serum Repository samples taken up to 10 years before diagnosis. A PFAS mixture was associated with Crohn’s (OR 2.13) and ulcerative colitis (OR 1.76), and the association held across the pre-diagnosis years. Caveat: small pilot study (25 cases of each disease, 25 controls) with semiquantitative measurements, and average PFAS levels were similar to the general U.S. population [30]. In October 2026 NIH awarded Mount Sinai $3.3 million to study the same military cohort in depth [38].
  • Counter-evidence: the Nurses’ Health Study found no association [31]. In Ronneby, Sweden, where firefighting foam contaminated a town’s drinking water, a registry study found no consistent increase in IBD [39]. A March 2026 review and meta-analysis found ulcerative colitis risk rose 7% per ng/mL PFOA, but the result was not statistically significant (95% CI −4.7% to +20.0%). It found no significant link for Crohn’s disease, and it rated overall confidence in the evidence as low [32].

Jet fuel (JP-5) and fuel hydrocarbons

  • ATSDR (2017): human data on JP-5, JP-8 and Jet A are limited. Animal studies show immune effects for JP-8 and Jet A, but JP-5 immune effects have not been adequately evaluated [33]. That is a research gap, not reassurance.
  • At Diego Garcia, rising benzene was documented in groundwater and soil vapor after the 1991 JP-5 leak [1]. How much reached finished drinking water in a given year is not in any public record we found.

Solvents, disinfection byproducts and lead

  • Camp Lejeune’s presumptions rest on solvent-contaminated water [23]. In the public Diego Garcia records we reviewed, we did not find documented industrial-solvent (e.g., TCE/PCE) contamination of drinking water. We did find high total trihalomethanes (chlorination byproducts) that made every tap undrinkable in 2017, plus lead and copper exceedances [6]. Whether solvents were ever tested for historically is unknown.

Honest framing: The science shows real, repeated associations, especially PFOA with ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease and some cancers, alongside mixed and low-confidence results. It does not prove what caused any individual veteran’s illness. Congress built presumptions for exactly this situation: when the government contaminated the water and kept no usable record, it should not demand proof that only the government could have produced.

F. Crohn’s, Ulcerative Colitis and IBS: What the Science Says and Why the Label Matters

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is the family of diseases that includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) sounds similar but is a different kind of condition. This section explains the difference in plain language, explains how IBD can develop silently and be worsened by service life, summarizes what the research does and does not show about contaminated water and IBD, and explains why the label on a veteran’s claim matters for veterans of Diego Garcia and other overseas bases. It summarizes published research and regulations for a general audience. It is not medical or legal advice.

Plain-language guide: Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis and IBS

Crohn’s disease (IBD)

A chronic disease in which abnormal immune reactions cause inflammation in the digestive tract. It most often affects the end of the small intestine and the start of the colon, but it can affect any part of the digestive tract from mouth to anus [41]. It can involve the entire thickness of the bowel wall, and it can “skip,” leaving healthy areas between diseased patches [45]. Complications can include blockages, fistulas and abscesses [41].

Ulcerative colitis (IBD)

A chronic disease in which abnormal immune reactions cause inflammation and ulcers on the inner lining of the large intestine [42]. It affects only the colon and rectum, only the innermost lining, and does not skip [45]. It can still be serious: severe flares can require hospital care or emergency surgery, and long-standing disease raises colorectal cancer risk [42].

IBD-unclassified (indeterminate colitis)

A recognized category of IBD that shares features of both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis but cannot be diagnosed as either [46]. Researchers have noted that in about 10% of cases there is no definitive way to tell the two diseases apart [35].

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)

A group of symptoms (repeated abdominal pain and changes in bowel movements) that occur without any visible signs of damage or disease in the digestive tract. Doctors classify it as a functional disorder, now called a disorder of gut-brain interaction [43].

IBD is not IBS. According to CDC, IBS does not cause inflammation (“the most critical distinction”), IBD is a kind of autoimmune disease while IBS is not, and IBD causes physical damage to the digestive tract while IBS does not. The two share symptoms such as abdominal pain and changes in bowel movements, and a person can have both at the same time [44].

Diagnoses often shift between Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis and IBD-unclassified

Many veterans with IBD see their diagnosis change over the years: Crohn’s disease in one record, ulcerative colitis in another, IBD-unclassified in a third. That is not unusual. Crohn’s disease of the colon and ulcerative colitis can be hard to tell apart, and the diagnosis can change as more evidence comes in [48]. In a Swedish national study of more than 44,000 IBD patients, 18% had their diagnosis change during follow-up, in both directions (39% of changes were from ulcerative colitis to Crohn’s, 33% from Crohn’s to ulcerative colitis, and 30% to or from IBD-unclassified) [47]. What stays constant is the family of disease. A record that moves between Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and IBD-unclassified is still a record of inflammatory bowel disease, not IBS.

IBD can start silently, and service may trigger or worsen it

IBD often begins long before anyone names it. Researchers describe a preclinical phase in which the disease process is already under way but has not been diagnosed. Stored military blood shows this clearly. Among 100 service members later diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, 65 already carried Crohn’s-associated antibodies in their earliest stored sample, a median of six years before diagnosis, and those with more of these antibodies were more likely to have complications around the time of diagnosis [56]. In the larger PREDICTS study of DoD Serum Repository samples, a panel of blood proteins and antibodies predicted Crohn’s disease up to five years before diagnosis; it worked much less well for ulcerative colitis [57]. A Swedish study did find inflammatory proteins raised in blood drawn up to 15 years before an ulcerative colitis diagnosis [58].

That means some service members may enter service with IBD that is silent and undetected, and others may develop it during service and not be diagnosed until years later. During that window, service exposures and stress may trigger or worsen the disease. The evidence on exposures is still limited and is mostly associations (see the research below). Stress is better studied. In a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada, high perceived stress was the only factor that independently predicted a later IBD flare; NSAIDs, antibiotics and infections did not [59]. The relationship also runs the other way. About one in three people with IBD have symptoms of anxiety and one in four have symptoms of depression, more when the disease is active [54]. Long-term studies show that active IBD predicts later anxiety and depression, and that anxiety and depression predict later flares, hospital stays and surgery [55]. That two-way loop matters for veterans, because the years when IBD may be developing silently can also be years of sustained stress in service.

The law already recognizes this pattern. Under 38 U.S.C. 1111, a veteran is presumed to have been in sound condition when accepted into service. The only exceptions are a condition noted at the entrance exam, or clear and unmistakable evidence both that the condition existed before service and that service did not aggravate it [60]. For a condition that did exist before service, 38 U.S.C. 1153 and 38 CFR 3.306 treat it as aggravated by service when it got worse during service, unless the worsening was due to the natural progress of the disease [61]. And a disease first diagnosed after discharge can still be service connected when the evidence shows it was incurred in service [62]. IBD that is still silent at entry is usually not noted at an entrance exam. What the law does not provide is a presumption for IBD. Without one, each veteran has to prove the connection alone, usually with a medical opinion that the disease at least as likely as not began in service or was worsened by it [17][62]. None of this shows that service causes IBD. It shows why the timing of IBD makes these claims so hard to prove one veteran at a time.

What the research shows, and which disease each study covers

The honest way to read this research is at the level of IBD as a whole, while being clear about which disease each study actually covers. Most results are associations, which means a pattern seen in groups of people. An association is not proof that an exposure caused any one person’s illness.

  • C8 Science Panel (2012). Covers: ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s, separately. In a highly exposed community, the court-appointed panel concluded “there is a probable link between exposure to C8 (also known as PFOA) and ulcerative colitis,” and found “no probable link” between PFOA and Crohn’s disease [27]. In the published study behind that finding, ulcerative colitis risk rose with cumulative PFOA exposure (rate ratios of 1.76, 2.63 and 2.86 across the upper three exposure groups), with no trend for Crohn’s disease [35]. Caveat: this study was about PFOA specifically. Diego Garcia’s published results combine PFOS and PFOA, so the share that was PFOA is not public [6].
  • National Academies (2022). Covers: ulcerative colitis. Rated the evidence for PFAS and ulcerative colitis in adults as “limited or suggestive,” one step below “sufficient” [34][36]. It recommended offering PFAS blood testing to people likely to have had elevated exposure, including people who lived near military bases, and, for those above 20 ng/mL, assessing for signs of ulcerative colitis at wellness visits [36].
  • Agrawal et al. (2024), active-duty service members. Covers: Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis. This Mount Sinai study used stored DoD Serum Repository samples drawn up to 10 years before diagnosis. A mixture of PFAS chemicals was associated with higher odds of Crohn’s disease (OR 2.13) and ulcerative colitis (OR 1.76), and the association held at every time point before diagnosis [30]. Caveats: it was a pilot study (25 people with Crohn’s, 25 with ulcerative colitis, 25 controls) with semiquantitative measurements, and the authors note the small size could overstate results. Average PFAS levels were similar to the general U.S. population, so it was not a study of a contaminated base [30].
  • NIH grant (October 5, 2026). Covers: Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis. NIH awarded Mount Sinai a five-year, $3.3 million R01 grant to study whether PFAS exposure disrupts the intestine’s protective lining and blood glycosylation years before Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis develops, using blood from the same military cohort [38]. This is research being funded, not a finding yet.
  • How PFAS could plausibly affect the gut. The National Toxicology Program concluded that PFOA and PFOS are “presumed to be an immune hazard to humans,” mainly because they suppress antibody responses [40]. In mouse intestinal tissue, PFOA caused loss of intestinal barrier function [29]. Two 2026 mouse studies found that PFOA exposure made chemically induced colitis more severe and disrupted gut bacteria; one saw the effect only in male mice and found no added risk in mice genetically prone to colitis [52][53]. Lab and animal findings like these show plausibility, not proof in people. We found no human study showing that PFAS worsens the course of existing IBD; Mount Sinai’s new grant will look at complications at diagnosis [38].
  • Evidence that points the other way. The Nurses’ Health Studies, which used blood drawn before diagnosis, found no association between PFAS and IBD in women [31]. In Ronneby, Sweden, where firefighting foam contaminated a town’s drinking water, a registry study found no consistent evidence that PFAS raised IBD risk. A small rise in Crohn’s disease among people exposed in the earliest period was not repeated in later, more heavily exposed periods [39]. A March 2026 meta-analysis found no statistically significant link between any single PFAS and either ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease, and rated confidence in the evidence as low. It could not include the military mixture study because that study did not report individual chemicals [32].

Reading it honestly: The strongest human evidence, from the C8 Science Panel and the National Academies, is for PFOA and ulcerative colitis. The evidence for Crohn’s disease is newer, smaller and mixed: the military serum study found an association, while the C8 study and the Ronneby study did not find a consistent one. Both forms of IBD appear in the positive studies, and none of these studies proves what caused any individual veteran’s disease. That uncertainty is the reason presumptions exist.

Jet fuel, benzene and solvents

  • We found no peer-reviewed study linking JP-5 jet fuel, benzene, or the solvents TCE and PCE in drinking water to Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. ATSDR reports that the immune effects of JP-5 have not been adequately evaluated [33]. That is a research gap, not reassurance.
  • Camp Lejeune is the closest precedent for contaminated base water, but ATSDR’s major health survey of Camp Lejeune Marines and civilians did not ask about IBD [51], and none of VA’s eight Camp Lejeune presumptive conditions is a digestive disease other than liver cancer [23]. Solvent exposure has been associated with other autoimmune diseases, such as systemic sclerosis [35], but not established for IBD.
  • In the same military serum cohort, a second Mount Sinai study found that a chemical mixture led by pesticides and one polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (pyrene) was associated with Crohn’s disease 6 to 10 years before diagnosis, and a pesticide-led mixture with ulcerative colitis [37]. It is small and says nothing specific about jet fuel in drinking water, but it shows that this military blood archive can be used to study exposures years before IBD appears.

Why the IBS label matters

Medically, IBS means symptoms without visible damage [43], while Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are diagnosed by finding inflammation and damage [44]. Calling IBD “IBS” describes a condition that, by definition, does not damage the digestive tract.

In VA’s rating schedule (38 CFR 4.114), they are separate diagnostic codes [49]:

  • DC 7319, irritable bowel syndrome: rated on abdominal pain and bowel-habit symptoms, with a maximum of 30 percent. Its note says it may include functional digestive disorders.
  • DC 7326, Crohn’s disease or undifferentiated form of inflammatory bowel disease: rated from 10 to 100 percent. Its criteria refer to treatment with immunosuppressants or other biologic agents, and VA requires the diagnosis to be confirmed by endoscopy or radiologic studies.
  • DC 7323, ulcerative colitis: “Rate as Crohn’s disease or undifferentiated form of inflammatory bowel disease (DC 7326).”

So under the current schedule, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and IBD-unclassified are all rated under the same IBD criteria. A change from one IBD subtype to another does not move a veteran out of that code. IBS is rated under a different code, with different criteria and a lower ceiling.

A systemic gap: IBD has rating codes but no presumptive path

To be precise about what exists: VA does have rating codes for IBD (DC 7326 for Crohn’s disease or undifferentiated IBD, and DC 7323 for ulcerative colitis, which is rated under DC 7326), and any veteran can claim IBD on a direct basis by showing an in-service event or exposure plus a medical opinion connecting the two [49]. What is missing is a presumptive path, the route that spares a veteran from proving the connection:

  • The Gulf War presumption covers functional gastrointestinal disorders such as IBS and expressly excludes structural gastrointestinal diseases, which leaves out Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis [50].
  • The PACT Act presumptions include gastrointestinal cancers of any type, but no inflammatory bowel disease [14].
  • The Camp Lejeune water presumptions list eight conditions, none of them IBD [23]. Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are not presumptive for any group we found.
  • VA has no presumptions of any kind for PFAS exposure [20].

The result is a mismatch. The one digestive presumption that exists outside of cancer is built around IBS, so a veteran with chronic bowel disease and a toxic-exposure history can end up with a claim framed as IBS, the condition that has a presumption, rather than as the IBD they actually have. That presumption reaches only service in the Southwest Asia theater, which by VA’s definition does not include Diego Garcia [50]. And an IBD claim decided as IBS is then judged against criteria written for a different condition [49]. This is a gap in the system, not a failure by any one person who helped a veteran file.

The ask: VA should recognize inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and IBD-unclassified) as a condition for formal toxic-exposure review under its existing presumption process [18], starting with PFAS, where the National Academies already rates the ulcerative colitis evidence as limited or suggestive [36]. At minimum, VA should make sure IBD claims are routed and decided as IBD: when the record shows Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis or IBD-unclassified confirmed by endoscopy or imaging, the claim should be evaluated under DC 7323/7326, not under the IBS code, and a change between IBD subtypes should never be grounds for denial.

Our position (advocacy, not a legal claim): A veteran whose diagnosis has moved between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis should not be denied because today’s label happens to be Crohn’s. Crohn’s disease can reach more of the digestive tract and the full thickness of the bowel wall, so it is often the more extensive form [45], although ulcerative colitis can also be severe [42]. Both are IBD, both are rated under the same IBD criteria [49], and a change in subtype does not change the underlying disease. The core problem is deciding an IBD claim under an IBS caption.

How this connects to Diego Garcia

Three Diego Garcia water systems were among only 24 DoD systems worldwide found above EPA’s 2016 PFOS/PFOA advisory [5], out-of-service wells reached 86,630 ppt in 2017 [6], and benzene was documented in groundwater after the 1991 JP-5 leak [1]. No public record shows what was in the finished drinking water in earlier years, or how much any service member drank. That is why no study, and no veteran, can currently connect a specific dose at Diego Garcia to a specific case of IBD.

The research above points to a practical way forward. The DoD Serum Repository already holds service members’ blood samples, and it has been used to measure PFAS years before IBD was diagnosed [30]. The same resource could be used to study veterans who served at Diego Garcia and other overseas installations (see Ask 7 in Section D).

Veterans of Diego Garcia and other overseas installations who have Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis can run into the same problems described above: a shifting IBD diagnosis, no presumption, and a claim framed as IBS.

G. Source List

  1. [1] Tribble, G.W. (2001). USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4090 (Diego Garcia fuel-contaminated ground water). https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/2001/4090/report.pdf
  2. [2] USGS Open-File Report 95-722: Diego Garcia ground-water status, Jan 1993–Jun 1995. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1995/0722/report.pdf
  3. [3] USGS Open-File Report 98-1: Diego Garcia ground-water status, Jan 1995–Sep 1997. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/0001/report.pdf
  4. [4] DoD, Aqueous Film Forming Foam Report to Congress (cleared Nov 3, 2017; data as of Dec 31, 2016), App. B. https://www.denix.osd.mil/derp/denix-files/sites/26/2017/11/Aqueous-Film-Forming-Foam-AFFF-Report-to-Congress_DENIX.pdf
  5. [5] DoD, PFOS and PFOA on Military Installations, Report to Congress (Apr 2020). https://media.defense.gov/2021/May/27/2002730765/-1/-1/0/DOD-PFOS-AND-PFOA-ON-MILITARY-INSTALLATIONS-RTC-APRIL-2020.PDF
  6. [6] U.S. Navy, NSF Diego Garcia Consumer Confidence Report (2017 data, issued 2018). https://pacific.navfac.navy.mil/Portals/72/Far_East/Documents/CCR_Diego_Garcia_2017.pdf
  7. [7] U.S. Navy press release, “Water You Can Now Drink” (Apr 5, 2018). https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/2247672/water-you-can-now-drink/
  8. [8] U.S. Navy news story on the NSF Diego Garcia water treatment plant (Jan 10, 2020). https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/display-news/Article/2236819/
  9. [9] U.S. Navy, 2025 Consumer Confidence Report, NSF Diego Garcia. https://cnrj.cnic.navy.mil/Portals/80/CNRJ/Documents/2025%20Water%20Reports/2025%20Consumer%20Confidence%20Report%20NSF%20Diego%20Garcia.pdf
  10. [10] Commander, Navy Region Japan, water-quality reports library. https://cnrj.cnic.navy.mil/Operations-and-Management/Water-Quality-Information/Water-quality-reports/
  11. [11] DoD Manual 4715.05 Vol. 3, Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance: Drinking Water (Jun 29, 2020). https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodm/471505m_Vol3.pdf
  12. [12] GAO-18-78, Drinking Water: DOD Has Acted on Some Emerging Contaminants but Should Improve Internal Reporting on Regulatory Compliance (2017). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-18-78
  13. [13] Public Law 117-168 (PACT Act). https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.htm
  14. [14] VA, The PACT Act and your VA benefits (updated Jun 2, 2026). https://www.va.gov/resources/the-pact-act-and-your-va-benefits/
  15. [15] VA, Gulf War Illness / Southwest Asia locations. https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/gulf-war-illness-southwest-asia/
  16. [16] 38 U.S.C. 1710 (TERA definition at (e)(4)(C)). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1710
  17. [17] 38 U.S.C. 1168 (TERA medical examinations). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1168
  18. [18] 38 U.S.C. 1172–1173 (formal evaluations for presumptions). https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1172
  19. [19] VA, Processing Claims Under the Honoring Our PACT Act, 89 FR 51224 (Jun 17, 2024), incl. VBA Letter 20-24-06 guidance. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-06-17/pdf/2024-13010.pdf
  20. [20] VA Public Health, PFAS. https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/pfas.asp
  21. [21] VA, Federal Register notice on PFAS scientific assessment, 90 FR 59325 (Dec 18, 2025). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/18/2025-23311/
  22. [22] Health.mil, ILER Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.health.mil/Reference-Center/Frequently-Asked-Questions/ILER
  23. [23] VA, Camp Lejeune water contamination; 38 CFR 3.309(f). https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/camp-lejeune-water-contamination/
  24. [24] H.R. 3639 (119th), VET PFAS Act. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/3639 ; text: https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr3639/BILLS-119hr3639ih.htm
  25. [25] H.R. 4192 (119th), Military PFAS Transparency Act of 2025. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4192
  26. [26] S. 2220 (119th), FORGOTTEN Veterans Act. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/2220
  27. [27] C8 Science Panel, Probable Link Reports (2011–2012). https://www.c8sciencepanel.org/prob_link.html
  28. [28] Steenland K, Kugathasan S, Barr DB. PFOA and ulcerative colitis. Environ Res 2018;165:317–321. https://hero.epa.gov/reference/5079806/
  29. [29] Fart F, Salihović S, McGlinchey A, et al. PFAS and late-onset ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021;56:1286–1295. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34383611/
  30. [30] Agrawal M, Midya V, et al. PFAS and IBD (DoD Serum Repository). Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024;22(8):1728–1730.e8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11209830/
  31. [31] Lochhead P, et al. PFAS and IBD, Nurses’ Health Studies. Environ Res 2022;207:112222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112222
  32. [32] Phillipson & Bartell. PFAS and IBD meta-analysis. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol (Mar 24, 2026). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-026-00851-0
  33. [33] ATSDR, Toxicological Profile for JP-5, JP-8, and Jet A Fuels (Mar 2017). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp121.pdf
  34. [34] National Academies, Guidance on PFAS Exposure, Testing, and Clinical Follow-Up (2022). https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/26156/chapter/1
  35. [35] Steenland K, Zhao L, Winquist A, Parks C. Ulcerative colitis and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in a highly exposed population of community residents and workers in the Mid-Ohio Valley. Environ Health Perspect 2013;121(8):900–905. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3734500/
  36. [36] National Academies, “New Report Calls for Expanded PFAS Testing for People With History of Elevated Exposure” (Jul 28, 2022). https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/new-report-calls-for-expanded-pfas-testing-for-people-with-history-of-elevated-exposure-offers-advice-for-clinical-treatment
  37. [37] Agrawal M, Ungaro RC, Rajauria P, Magee J, Petrick L, Midya V. High serum pesticide levels are associated with increased odds of inflammatory bowel disease in a nested case-control study. Gastroenterology 2025;168(3):608–611.e4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39549765/
  38. [38] Mount Sinai press release, “NIH Awards Mount Sinai Researcher $3.3 Million to Study How ‘Forever Chemicals’ May Contribute to IBD” (Oct 5, 2026). https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2026/nih-awards-mount-sinai-researcher-3-million-to-study-how-forever-chemicals-may-contribute-to-ibd
  39. [39] Xu Y, Li Y, Scott K, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease and biomarkers of gut inflammation and permeability in a community with high exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances through drinking water (Ronneby, Sweden). Environ Res 2020;181:108923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108923
  40. [40] National Toxicology Program, Immunotoxicity Associated with Exposure to PFOA or PFOS (monograph, Sep 2016). https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/research/assessments/noncancer/completed/pfoa
  41. [41] NIDDK, Definition & Facts for Crohn’s Disease. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/crohns-disease/definition-facts
  42. [42] NIDDK, Definition & Facts for Ulcerative Colitis. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/ulcerative-colitis/definition-facts
  43. [43] NIDDK, Definition & Facts for Irritable Bowel Syndrome. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/irritable-bowel-syndrome/definition-facts
  44. [44] CDC, Commonly Mistaken Conditions (IBD) (Jun 12, 2024). https://www.cdc.gov/inflammatory-bowel-disease/about/myths.html
  45. [45] Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, Overview of Crohn’s Disease. https://www.crohnscolitisfoundation.org/patientsandcaregivers/what-is-crohns-disease/overview
  46. [46] Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation, Indeterminate colitis (also known as IBD-unclassified). https://www.crohnscolitisfoundation.org/indeterminate-colitis-also-known-ibd-unclassified
  47. [47] Everhov ÅH, Sachs MC, Malmborg P, et al. Changes in inflammatory bowel disease subtype during follow-up and over time in 44,302 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019;54(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1564361
  48. [48] Guindi M, Riddell RH. Indeterminate colitis. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:1233–1244. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1770507/
  49. [49] 38 CFR 4.114, Schedule of ratings, digestive system (as amended 89 FR 19743, Mar 20, 2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-38/section-4.114
  50. [50] 38 CFR 3.317, Compensation for certain disabilities occurring in Persian Gulf veterans. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-38/section-3.317
  51. [51] ATSDR, Morbidity Study of Former Marines, Employees, and Dependents Potentially Exposed to Contaminated Drinking Water at U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (2018). https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/camp-lejeune/media/pdfs/health_survey_report-508.pdf
  52. [52] Cheng et al. Perfluorooctanoic acid exposure disrupts gut microbiota and aggravates experimental colitis. Environ Pollut 2026;406:128646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128646
  53. [53] Park et al. Oral exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid disrupts the microbiota-gut-liver axis and enhances the severity of chemically induced colitis in mice. Environ Pollut 2026;409:128915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128915
  54. [54] Barberio B, Zamani M, Black CJ, et al. Prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6(5):359–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00014-5
  55. [55] Fairbrass KM, Lovatt J, Barberio B, et al. Bidirectional brain–gut axis effects influence mood and prognosis in IBD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2022;71(9):1773–1780. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34725197/
  56. [56] Choung RS, Princen F, Stockfisch TP, et al. Serologic microbial associated markers can predict Crohn’s disease behaviour years before disease diagnosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016;43(12):1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13641
  57. [57] Torres J, Petralia F, Sato T, et al. Serum biomarkers identify patients who will develop inflammatory bowel diseases up to 5 years before diagnosis (PREDICTS). Gastroenterology 2020;159(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.007
  58. [58] Bergemalm D, et al. Systemic inflammation in preclinical ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34298022/
  59. [59] Bernstein CN, Singh S, Graff LA, et al. A prospective population-based study of triggers of symptomatic flares in IBD. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105(9):1994–2002. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20372115/
  60. [60] 38 U.S.C. 1111, Presumption of sound condition. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1111
  61. [61] 38 U.S.C. 1153, Aggravation; 38 CFR 3.306, Aggravation of preservice disability. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1153; https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-38/section-3.306
  62. [62] 38 CFR 3.303, Principles relating to service connection (see 3.303(d)). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-38/section-3.303

Contact

Shawn C. Tovey, RCDD
U.S. Navy Veteran
Copperas Cove, TX
toveys@msn.com

Download PDF